Introduction
The Federal Tax Authority has issued an updated version of its Corporate Tax Guide on the Taxation of Family Foundations . The updated guide, issued in June 2026, builds on the first version published in May 2025 and provides further clarification on the Corporate Tax treatment of Family Foundations, trusts, underlying holding vehicles, special purpose vehicles (“SPV’s”) and family offices.
The update is important for private wealth structures in the UAE. It does not change the core policy of the Corporate Tax regime, which remains broadly supportive of genuine family wealth holding and succession structures. However, it provides useful guidance on issues that frequently arise in practice, particularly where Family Foundations sit above one or more holding companies or SPVs.
The FTA’s update table identifies the amended sections as Sections 2.5, 3.3, 3.4, 6, 7.8, 7.9 and 7.10. The most significant changes relate to LLCs, multi-tier structures, jointly owned SPVs, transfers to Family Foundations, entities moving into or out of Family Foundation ownership, and the Corporate Tax position of family offices.
These updates should be welcomed. They provide greater clarity for families and advisers. However, the guide remains a Corporate Tax guide. It does not resolve all legal, regulatory, land registration, ownership, governance or implementation issues that may arise when establishing or restructuring a Family Foundation. Those issues remain central to the design of any private wealth structure.
Legislative Context
Under the UAE Corporate Tax regime, a Family Foundation may apply to be treated as an Unincorporated Partnership where the relevant conditions are met. If the application is approved, the Family Foundation is treated as fiscally transparent. This means that the Family Foundation is not taxed in its own right and its income, assets, liabilities and expenditure are treated as arising directly to its beneficiaries.
This treatment is particularly relevant where the beneficiaries are natural persons. Income attributed to them through a fiscally transparent Family Foundation may remain outside the scope of Corporate Tax where that income would have constituted Personal Investment income or Real Estate Investment income if earned directly.
The policy objective is to preserve tax neutrality for genuine family wealth holding and succession structures. The regime is not intended to tax passive personal wealth merely because it is held through a properly established foundation or trust structure. Equally, the regime is not intended to allow commercial business activities to be conducted outside the Corporate Tax framework.
The June 2026 update does not alter this core framework. Instead, it clarifies how the framework applies in practical structuring scenarios.
Updated Legislative References
The guide has been updated to include additional legislative references relevant to the Free Zone regime, including Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2023 on Determining Qualifying Income for the Qualifying Free Zone Person and Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025 regarding Qualifying Activities and Excluded Activities.
This update is relevant because the June 2026 guide now includes a specific discussion on family offices and the potential availability of the 0 percent Corporate Tax rate for Qualifying Income derived by Free Zone Persons. The inclusion of these references reflects that Family Foundation structures cannot be analysed in isolation from the wider Corporate Tax regime, particularly where the structure includes Free Zone entities or family office service companies.
Refined Trust Wording
The guide has also refined its description of trusts. The updated wording refers to a settlor transferring and assigning assets to be held and managed upon trust by a trustee for the benefit of beneficiaries.
This is not a major tax change. However, it is a more precise legal formulation and reflects the distinction between legal ownership and beneficial entitlement. That distinction is particularly important in trust structures, where the trustee holds legal title to assets but does so for the benefit of the beneficiaries in accordance with the terms of the trust deed.
From a Corporate Tax perspective, this distinction is relevant because unincorporated trusts are generally treated as fiscally transparent by default. From a legal and implementation perspective, however, it remains necessary to consider whether the trust structure is recognised, or can be accommodated, by the relevant asset registries, land departments, licensing authorities and contractual counterparties.
LLCs Are Not Similar Entities
One of the clearest updates is the clarification that a limited liability company is not a “similar entity” for the purposes of the Family Foundation definition.
This means that an LLC cannot qualify directly as a Family Foundation merely because it is used to hold family wealth. An LLC remains a juridical person and is not, in itself, a foundation, trust or similar entity.
This clarification is important because LLCs are commonly used in UAE private wealth structures. Families may use LLCs to hold real estate, shares, operating companies, investment portfolios or other assets. The updated guide confirms that an LLC should not be analysed as though it were itself a Family Foundation.
However, this does not mean that LLCs are excluded from the Family Foundation regime altogether. An LLC may still be capable of being treated as fiscally transparent where it is wholly owned and controlled by a Family Foundation that is itself treated as an Unincorporated Partnership, and where the LLC satisfies the relevant conditions.
The distinction is therefore between direct qualification and derivative qualification within a qualifying structure. An LLC cannot enter the regime directly as a Family Foundation. It may, however, be eligible for transparent treatment as a lower tier juridical person beneath a qualifying Family Foundation.
Multi-Tier Structures
The most important update concerns multi-tier structures.
Private wealth structures frequently include a foundation or trust at the top, with one or more holding companies or SPVs beneath it. Those lower tier entities may hold real estate, shares, securities, investment portfolios or other assets. In practice, there has been uncertainty as to whether these lower tier entities can also be treated as fiscally transparent.
The June 2026 guide provides helpful clarification. It confirms that where a juridical person is wholly owned and controlled by a Family Foundation, the beneficiary condition may also be regarded as satisfied where the lower tier entity serves the same holistic purpose as the Family Foundation.
This is a practical and important development. A lower tier company may not have beneficiaries in the same legal sense as a foundation or trust. Its shareholder may simply be the Family Foundation. The updated guidance recognises that, where the company is wholly owned and controlled within the Family Foundation structure, its purpose and beneficiaries may be assessed by reference to the wider Family Foundation arrangement.
This clarification is particularly helpful for holding companies and SPVs that exist solely to hold or manage assets for the benefit of the Family Foundation’s beneficiaries.
However, the clarification should not be read as removing the need for entity-by-entity analysis. Each entity must still be reviewed separately. The lower tier entity must be wholly owned and controlled through an uninterrupted transparent chain. It must also meet the relevant conditions, including the requirement that it does not conduct activities that would constitute a Business or Business Activity if undertaken directly by the relevant natural persons.
Jointly Owned SPVs Held by More Than One Family Foundation
The June 2026 update also makes a material change to the treatment of a SPV owned by more than one Family Foundation.
The updated guide now indicates that a juridical person can be wholly owned by more than one Family Foundation. This is a significant clarification. It means that an SPV jointly owned by two or more Family Foundations may, in principle, be capable of applying for fiscally transparent treatment, provided that the ownership and control conditions are met and the SPV satisfies the other relevant requirements.
This is relevant to family branch structures. It is common for different family branches to use separate foundations or separate governance platforms while jointly holding specific assets or investment vehicles. The updated guide recognises that a jointly owned SPV should not automatically be excluded from transparent treatment merely because it is held by more than one Family Foundation.
The key requirement remains that the SPV must be wholly owned and controlled by one or more Family Foundations that are themselves treated as Unincorporated Partnerships. Control should be assessed carefully, including voting rights, profit rights and the ability to determine the composition of the board or equivalent governing body.
This clarification is likely to be one of the most practically useful elements of the June 2026 update.
Transfers to a Family Foundation
The updated guide introduces a new section on transfers to a Family Foundation.
A founder, settlor or other transferor may transfer assets or funds to a Family Foundation on establishment or at a later stage. The Corporate Tax treatment of that transfer depends on the status of the transferor, the nature of the assets and the relationship between the parties.
Where the transferor is a Related Party of the Family Foundation, the transaction should satisfy the arm’s length standard. This is important where the transferor is a Taxable Person or where the value attributed to the transfer may affect the Corporate Tax position of a Taxable Person.
The guide also confirms that gains or losses arising on transfers may be subject to Corporate Tax depending on the specific facts and circumstances, including whether the transferor is a Taxable Person or becomes a Taxable Person as a result of the transaction.
However, where the transferor is a natural person and the assets transferred are Personal Investments or Real Estate Investments, the transaction should not be subject to Corporate Tax.
This clarification is helpful for founders and families contributing assets into a Family Foundation. It confirms that genuine transfers of personal investment assets by natural persons should generally remain outside the Corporate Tax net. At the same time, it highlights that transfers involving Taxable Persons, Related Parties or assets outside the Personal Investment or Real Estate Investment categories require more careful analysis.
Juridical Persons Acquired or Sold by a Family Foundation
The June 2026 guide also addresses the position where a juridical person is acquired or sold by a Family Foundation.
A juridical person may become wholly owned and controlled by a Family Foundation after acquisition. If the relevant conditions are met, that juridical person may cease to be a Taxable Person and become fiscally transparent. Conversely, a juridical person may cease to be transparent where it is sold by the Family Foundation or no longer satisfies the relevant conditions.
The key clarification is that, where a juridical person moves into or out of fiscally transparent treatment, this does not, of itself, result in an adjustment to the base cost of assets held by that juridical person for Corporate Tax purposes. In other words, the fact that the juridical person was treated as fiscally transparent for certain periods is ignored for this purpose.
This is a useful clarification for acquisitions, disposals and restructurings. It means that changes in the Corporate Tax classification of the entity do not, by themselves, reset the base cost of the assets held by that entity.
This point will be particularly relevant where existing holding companies are introduced into a Family Foundation structure, or where companies that have been treated as transparent are later disposed of or removed from the structure.
Family Offices
The updated guide includes a new section on Single Family Offices and Multi Family Offices.
The updated guide states that a Single-Family Office or Multi Family Office may be wholly owned and controlled by a Family Foundation. However, given the nature of family office activities, such an entity is unlikely to meet all of the conditions for transparent treatment, particularly the condition that it must not conduct a Business or Business Activity.
This reflects the distinction between a passive family wealth holding structure and an active service provider. A family office may provide investment management, administration, reporting, governance, advisory, concierge or other services. Where it earns management fees or other income, it will generally be subject to Corporate Tax in its own right.
The guide also states that a family office must be remunerated at arm’s length for services provided to Related Parties and Connected Persons. This is particularly relevant where the family office provides services to the Family Foundation, holding companies, SPVs or family members.
This update is commercially important. Many private wealth structures include a family office alongside a foundation or trust. The family office may be part of the family’s overall governance platform, but it should not be assumed to share the same Corporate Tax treatment as the passive holding structure.
Free Zone Family Offices
The updated guide also addresses the potential application of the Free Zone regime to family offices.
Where a Single-Family Office or Multi Family Office is a Free Zone Person, it may be able to benefit from the 0 percent Corporate Tax rate on Qualifying Income from Qualifying Activities. This may include wealth and investment management services or fund management services, provided the relevant conditions are satisfied and the services are subject to the required regulatory oversight.
However, the guide makes an important distinction. Merely holding a licence is not sufficient. The services must be subject to regulatory oversight by a competent authority in the UAE. Relevant competent authorities include the UAE Central Bank, the Dubai Financial Services Authority in the DIFC and the Financial Services Regulatory Authority in the ADGM.
This is a significant practical point. A family office established in a Free Zone should not assume that its income automatically qualifies for the 0 percent rate. The analysis must consider the precise activity, the nature of the income, the regulatory status of the entity and whether the conditions of the Free Zone regime are met.
For families using DIFC or ADGM family office structures, this clarification is particularly relevant.
Legal and Commercial Issues Remain Relevant
The June 2026 update provides important Corporate Tax clarification, but it should not be read as resolving every legal or commercial issue relevant to the establishment or restructuring of a Family Foundation.
This is important because private wealth structures are not designed for tax purposes alone. They are usually established to support succession planning, asset protection, governance, continuity, confidentiality, investment management and long-term family control. Corporate Tax treatment is an important part of the analysis, but it is only one part.
The first issue is asset ownership. A structure may be capable of being treated as fiscally transparent for Corporate Tax purposes, but that does not mean that it can legally or practically hold all intended assets. This is particularly relevant for real estate, regulated businesses, bankable assets, pledged assets and shares in licensed entities.
Real estate requires particular care. The Corporate Tax Guide addresses Real Estate Investment income, but it does not determine whether a foundation, trust or SPV can own real property in a particular Emirate. That analysis depends on land department practice, foreign ownership rules, designated area restrictions and whether exceptional approvals are required. A structure may therefore be efficient from a Corporate Tax perspective but unsuitable if the relevant property cannot be transferred or registered in the intended manner.
The second issue is implementation. Transfers into a Family Foundation structure may involve shares, real estate, investment portfolios, bank accounts, operating businesses or other assets. These transfers may trigger change of control provisions, lender consent requirements, shareholder approvals, regulatory notifications, licensing restrictions or contractual approval rights. These issues should be identified before implementation. They are not merely administrative matters to be addressed after the Corporate Tax position has been confirmed.
The third issue is governance. The Corporate Tax analysis does not determine who should control the structure, who should sit on the foundation council or trustee board, what powers should be reserved to the founder, how family branches should be represented, how distributions should be approved, or what happens on death, incapacity or dispute. These matters must be addressed in the constitutional documents, by-laws, trust deed, shareholders’ agreements or other governance documents. A structure that is tax efficient may still fail commercially if the governance framework is unclear or not capable of operating across generations.
The fourth issue is the use of underlying SPVs. The June 2026 update is helpful because it clarifies when lower tier juridical persons may access transparent treatment. However, the decision to use SPVs is not purely tax driven. Underlying companies may be needed to segregate assets, manage liability, facilitate bank financing, satisfy asset registration requirements, hold operating companies or preserve the integrity of a trust or foundation arrangement. The corporate structure should therefore be designed by reference to asset holding, governance, regulatory feasibility, banking requirements and tax.
The fifth issue is confidentiality and disclosure. Families often value confidentiality, but private does not mean invisible. DIFC and ADGM entities may have UBO disclosure obligations. Foundations may require disclosure of founders, council members, guardians, beneficiaries or persons exercising control, depending on the applicable regime. Banks, regulators, land departments and the FTA may also require information. These disclosure obligations are separate from Corporate Tax transparency and should be reviewed at the outset.
The sixth issue is cost and administration. A Family Foundation, trust, SPV or family office may require registered agents, corporate service providers, accounts, audit procedures, annual confirmations, renewal filings, professional council members or trustees, and ongoing record keeping. The expected tax and governance benefits should be weighed against the administrative burden and long-term maintenance cost.
Practical Implications
The June 2026 update provides several practical messages for private wealth structuring.
First, the classification of each entity remains critical. A Family Foundation, trust, LLC, SPV and family office may form part of the same commercial structure, but they are not treated in the same way for Corporate Tax purposes.
Second, LLCs and SPVs should not be assumed to qualify directly as Family Foundations. Their ability to access transparent treatment depends on whether they are wholly owned and controlled by a qualifying Family Foundation and whether they satisfy the relevant conditions.
Third, multi-tier structures require careful design. The ownership and control chain must remain uninterrupted and transparent. If an entity in the chain is not transparent, this may affect the treatment of entities below it.
Fourth, jointly owned SPVs held by more than one Family Foundation may now have a clearer pathway to transparent treatment. This may be useful for family branch structures and jointly held investment vehicles.
Fifth, transfers into Family Foundations should be reviewed before implementation. The position may be straightforward where natural persons transfer Personal Investments or Real Estate Investments, but more complex where Taxable Persons, Related Parties or other assets are involved.
Sixth, family offices should generally be treated separately from the passive holding structure. A family office that provides services and earns income will usually be a taxable service provider.
Seventh, Free Zone treatment should not be assumed. For family offices, the availability of the 0 percent rate may depend on regulatory oversight and the nature of the services provided.
Procedural compliance also remains important. Registration, applications for transparent treatment and annual confirmations should be built into the implementation timetable, rather than treated as post completion administration.
Finally, legal and commercial feasibility should be reviewed alongside the tax analysis. Corporate Tax transparency does not, by itself, confirm that the structure can hold the relevant assets, satisfy land department practice, obtain regulatory approvals, comply with contractual restrictions or achieve the family’s governance objectives.
Conclusion
The June 2026 update to the FTA Family Foundations Guide is a welcome development. It does not alter the basic policy of the UAE Corporate Tax regime, which remains broadly supportive of genuine private wealth holding and succession structures. However, it provides important clarifications on how the regime applies in practice.
The most significant updates concern LLCs, multi-tier structures, jointly owned SPVs, transfers to Family Foundations, changes in ownership of juridical persons and the treatment of family offices.
For families and advisers, the message is clear. Family Foundation structures remain highly useful in the UAE, but the Corporate Tax treatment depends on correct classification, proper ownership and control, appropriate activities, timely applications and ongoing compliance.
At the same time, Corporate Tax is only one part of the structuring analysis. Families should also consider asset ownership restrictions, land department practice, licensing and regulatory approvals, change of control provisions, financing arrangements, UBO disclosure, governance mechanics, succession arrangements and ongoing administration.
A well-designed structure should therefore be tax efficient, legally workable, commercially practical and capable of supporting long term family governance.
Seek Legal Counsel
Our expertise in tax law and regulations allows us to provide clients with effective and accurate tax advice, taking into consideration their unique circumstances and needs.
Our tax and financial crimes team, led by our Head of Tax and Financial Crimes, Mohamed El Baghdady, has successfully advised and represented clients across various industries, including, but not limited to, consumer goods and retail, services, real estate, oil and gas and banking and finance, before Government authorities, tax tribunals and courts. Our clients have been successful in multiple tax disputes before the committees and courts.
For further information, please contact Mohamed El Baghdady, Partner, Head of Tax and Financial Crimes, on mohamed.elbaghdady@habibalmulla.com.
Disclaimer
The content provided in this article is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this information, the article does not offer a guarantee or warranty regarding its content. The matters discussed in this article are subject to interpretation, and legal outcomes may vary based on specific facts and circumstances. We recommend that readers seek individual legal counsel before making any decisions based on the information provided. If you require specific legal advice, please contact us directly.